All research sources
Sources & Citations

The August 17 Deadline: How FERC's Show-Cause Order Rewrites the AI Factory Interconnection Playbook

14 primary sources 6 categories We publish the receipts
The essay The August 17 Deadline: How FERC's Show-Cause Order Rewrites the AI Factory Interconnection Playbook
A

The one-day rewrite

JD Supra national · McGuireWoods · Electron Economics

On August 17, 2026, six grid operators file the answers that will govern how every large AI campus in the United States connects to the grid for the next decade. This is the Show Cause Response deadline set by the Federal Energy Regulatory…

JD Supra national preview View source

On August 17, 2026, six grid operators file the answers that will govern how every large AI campus in the United States connects to the grid for the next decade. This is the Show Cause Response deadline set by the Federal Energy Regulatory…

McGuireWoods client alert View source

Each order directs the grid operator to “justify how their existing tariffs provide for the interconnection of large and co-located loads to the electric grid or to propose revisions to their tariffs” (McGuireWoods). Six markets, one order…

Electron Economics View source
B

Why “informational” reports were the real preview

PJM

PJM has already taken the third path. Filed since this cycle began On July 28, 2026, PJM moved to hold EL26-67 in abeyance for 90 days and to file its Section 205 response by early-to-mid November 2026.

PJM, Motion for Abeyance View source
C

The PJM template: the 50 MW line and the December 18 cutoff

White & Case · POWER Magazine

The order, cited in FERC's docket as PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 193 FERC ¶ 61,217 (2025), directed PJM to create three new transmission service options for co-located customers — firm contract demand, non-firm contract demand, and an…

White & Case View source

Above 50 MW cumulative nameplate, that self-supply can no longer net against transmission charges — it is billed as if the generator were not there. PJM filed compliance on January 20 and February 23, 2026 in Docket ER26-5181, and the…

POWER Magazine View source
D

The queue reality: PJM Cycle 1 and 200 GW of ambition

PJM Inside Lines

On August 3, 2026, PJM announced that 715 new generation projects, totaling 201.5 GW of nameplate capacity, had qualified to be studied in Cycle 1 out of 811 initial proposals.

PJM Inside Lines View source
E

Batch Zero: ERCOT does the same thing, faster

Krishnan Rangachari · SB 6

On June 18, 2026 — the same day FERC issued the six show-cause orders — the Public Utility Commission of Texas approved Planning Guide Revision Request 145 and Nodal Protocol Revision Request 1325, effective July 11, 2026.

Krishnan Rangachari, “The Data Center Reckoning” View source

Evaluating 438,000 MW project-by-project was, as one analyst put it, a queue “too large to be evaluated project-by-project without collapsing under its own backlog.” The Batch Zero schedule runs from mid-July 2026 technical submissions, to…

SB 6, Sec. 37.0561 View source
F

The reliability overlay: NERC Level 3 and the August 3 gate

NERC · Renewable Energy · ERCOT LLWG

On May 4, 2026, following a Board of Trustees vote on April 16, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation issued a Level 3 Essential Action Alert titled Computational Load Modeling, Studies, Instrumentation, Commissioning,…

On May 4, 2026, following a Board of Trustees vote on April 16, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation issued a Level 3 Essential Action Alert titled Computational Load Modeling, Studies, Instrumentation, Commissioning,…

Renewable Energy World View source

Formal responses were due by midnight Eastern on August 3, 2026 through the NERC Alert System.

ERCOT LLWG briefing View source

NERC has stated its intent to file revised registration criteria and Reliability Standards for large loads on or before December 31, 2026 (NERC filing in RM26-4). Two operator-facing implications matter.

NERC filing View source

Second, the underlying finding of NERC's March 2026 white paper is that existing NERC Reliability Standards, industry processes, and requirements are “inadequate for the reliable integration of emerging large loads, including computational…

NERC Large Loads FAQ View source
These are the primary sources behind our research. Have a better one, or spot an error? Tell us — we’ll correct it.